@sciam This is the most important thread for SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN. It's important to ACKNOWLEDGE when you've made a HUGE mistake and to OWN your mistake. So far, you are refusing to take the ONLY SCIENTIFIC approach to being informed of your COLOSSAL mistake.
Unroll available on Thread Reader
https://twitter.com/lasikeyecenter1/status/1777819621971956209
@sciam and it's FUNNY that YOU talk about the Dunning-Kruger effect when it applies to YOUR EDITORS.
Hilarious.
See, the way it works in science?
IF I present info that is LIFE-THREATENING for children (and for adults) and you REFUSE to acknowledge the information, then--
@sciam you are demonstrating DEPRAVED INDIFFERENCE to the sanctity of human life, ESPECIALLY when you've been PROMOTING the vaccine and I show you EXACTLY how you were promoting a vaccine that DESTROYS healthy heart cells as the MAIN EFFECT.
@sciam A TRULY scientific American would NEVER agree with the use of FORCE or MANDATES to violate another person's bodily autonomy.
Because if you DO happen to be WRONG? You will have to OWN YOUR MANDATE and take FULL fiscal responsibility for the damage you PROMOTED.
@sciam This is where the neighbor analogy is so useful, because when they actually DO agree with mandates? then they are clueless and so I need to break it down and make it VERY simple for these dummies.
@sciam Hypothetical. I have a MIRACLE drug. I tell my neighbor whose son uses it and becomes a paraplegic. He will never talk to me again.
BUT, imagine if I hold his son down and FORCE it down his throat and THEN he's paralyzed from the neck down. That dad will hunt me down.
@sciam The DEM leadership decided that MANDATES were GOOD even though MANDATES for a vaccine injection that pierces a person's skin IS the violation of a person's bodily autonomy.
Now, I show PERFECTLY how the MAIN effect of the vaccine is to cause PRECIPITINS which cause CLOTS.
@sciam The DEM leadership DID mandate this crap because they were so CERTAIN that it was GOOD. Well, it clearly is the VERY OPPOSITE of that. They now OWN their actions and mandates and censorship. It is THEIRS. There WILL be accountability.
Did I EXPLAIN why only DUMMIES do this?
@sciam Did Scientific American even CONSIDER that their vaccine promotion activities were actually "insured" & that they DID have "vaccine legal immunity" via the PREP ACT but that the PREP ACT does include an EXCEPTION and that willful misconduct NEGATES their "vaccine legal immunity?"
@sciam NOW, Scientific American is in a BIZARRELY weird situation where they are going to be OUTED as NOT ACTING "scientific" IF they just IGNORE all this very LIFE-THREATENING information about the vaccine and bury their head in the sand.
Let's deal with this SCIENTIFICALLY, shall we?
@sciam EVERY medical intervention has a R/B ratio.
With the STRING and MIDDLE MAN mechanisms, I basically DESTROY what you thought was your LOW RISK for the COVID vaccine.
I must have WORSENED that R/B ratio by at least a 1000 fold with those two Mechanisms.
@sciam Let me now DESTROY your perceived HUGE BENEFIT of the COVID vaccine.
The hypothesis for the COVID mRNA vaccine in their FDA clinical trial was this,
A neutralizing Ab in the lung that BINDS the virus before it can infect a lung alveolar epithelial cell.
Here's the HUGE FLAW
@sciam The alveolar WALL is the blood lung barrier. OUTSIDE this barrier, COVID Abs are made. INSIDE this barrier, COVID is infecting lung cells. In ORDER for the COVID Ab to WORK, it must CROSS this lung barrier.
Problem. The lung barrier, alveolar wall, blood lung barrier,
@sciam this AIR GAS barrier can stop WATER molecules from filling our lung air space and water molecules are equivalent in mass to 18 protons or daltons.
The IgG COVID antibody is a gargantuan 145,000 proton/Dalton molecule.
It is a HUGE OVERSIGHT. I let Fauci know in SEP 2020.
@sciam Fauci replied via Dr. Erbelding who tried to SWEEP this issue under the rug.
I replied to THEIR reply with 73 pages.
josephyleemd.substack.com/p/dr-emily-erb…
@sciam Here is the 73 pages.
US copyright. No. TXu002243916, 2021-02-03
73 pages
img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/1a1e…
@sciam I'm PRETTY sure that I've just DESTROYED what you thought was your HUGE BENEFIT for the R/b ratio for your COVID vaccine with this LUNG BARRIER issue.
As an aside? for comparison? The BLOOD LUNG BARRIER which is EXTREMELY well studied, typically has a LIMIT for molecule size
@sciam This BLOOD BRAIN BARRIER typically has a limit for molecule size and it's under 500 Daltons.
The BLOOD LUNG BARRIER which CAN keep our lung air space DRY is NOT going to permit a 145,000 Dalton IgG molecule to just DIFFUSE across it.
@sciam Isn't this pretty ELEMENTARY level SCIENCE Scientific American?
And YET, the vaccinologists were UTTERLY wrong on SOO many points.
Didn't I just DESTROY your perceived BENEFIT? By at LEAST a factor of a 1000?
So, COMBINED, whatever you thought your R/B ratio was?
@sciam I just WORSENED your R/B ratio for the COVID mRNA vaccine by at LEAST a MILLION FOLD.
But, I'll take a 1000.
IF I DID worsen your R/B ratio by even only a THOUSAND fold, you would have to take down the COVID mRNA vaccine. EVEN if the R/B ratio was WORSE by a factor of a 100.
@sciam So, I've shown you EXACTLY why the COVID mRNA vaccine can't provide BENEFITY via a neutralizing Ab in the LUNG.
Just the most BASIC SCIENCE. SIZE.
And not a TINY mistake. NO ONE EVEN CHECKED for the SIZE ISSUE.
@sciam Isn't a HUGE part of SCIENCE KNOWING relative SIZE?
Isn't that just the most BASIC 1st grader level SCIENCE?
Clearly the SIZE issue is HUGE. But what's more INCREDIBLY stupid???
It is APPARENT from the HUGE glaring MISTAKE that NO ONE EVEN ASKED IF THE SIZE WAS A PROBLEM.
@sciam If you ASKED about size and got it WRONG by something like an extra digit (honest mistakes can happen) or someone ADDED a zero (dumb mistakes can happen) but to be OFF by THIS MUCH?
NO ONE EVER even WONDERED if the COVID IgG antibody that is GARGANTUAN, how it GOT INTO THE LUNG?
@sciam Very UNSCIENTIFIC for Scientific American not to UNDERSTAND all this.
ALL this must be PERFECTLY CLEAR to the Editors at SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN since they DO act as if they KNOW what it takes to be a
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN.
@sciam and guess what.
I'm STILL NOT DONE. Yeah, that's how WRONG you were on EVERY ASPECT of the COVID vaccine and pandemic.
crazy. but, time for family. Tomorrow, MORE.
Remember what BLOCKING ME DOES.
reminds me of those who say "I can't possibly believe in God, I am a scientist"
My father whose profession was preventive medicine but he began as a Navy Corpsman
once said "One need only study anatomy to fully grasp the presence of God in creating it all"
.
I’ve Got $100 That Says :
If Enough Doctors Die
We Can Cure Cancer.
.