EMAIL to the Journal of Immunology, Editor in Chief, describing the ONE DIAGRAM to END half the booster vaccines on EARTH. Dr. Eugene Oltz.

Date: October 5, 2023

Chair, Department of Microbial Infection and Immunity
Samuel Saslaw Professor of Infectious Diseases, Microbial Infection and Immunity

776A Biomedical Research Tower (BRT)
460 W 12th Ave, Columbus OH 43210
Eugene.Oltz@osumc.edu
614-293-7570

Dear Dr. Eugene Oltz, 

I also called and left a message.

This is the preface to the 156 page letter attached here.  The most important section is the “Lee String ” Mechanism.  This String mechanism will end half the vaccines on earth this year.  This is a matter of utmost importance for protecting American lives and protecting our children. 

It is the simplest mechanism.  When you are infected with a COVID virus, since the Spike antigen is attached to the virus particle, you do not form antibodies against the bottom of the spike antigen, you DO form antibodies to the top of the spike antigen. 

In a vaccine setting, you have free spike antigen in the blood and lymph and you will form antibodies to the TOP of the spike and ALSO to the BOTTOM of the spike antigen.  There is no dispute that there are MULTIPLE antigenic sites on the Spike antigen. 

Prior to receiving a booster vaccine, we all agree that, without a doubt, these three components are in the blood. 

• COVID antibodies to the top of the spike antigen are present. 

• COVID antibodies to the bottom of the spike antigen are present.   

Once, the booster is given, spike antigen is added to the above two antibodies.  Following a booster COVID mRNA vaccine given within a few months of the first COVID mRNA vaccine, there will be present in the blood at the same time; COVID antibodies to the top of the spike antigen, COVID antibodies to the bottom of the spike antigen, and spike antigen.  No vaccine scientist on earth can dispute these three points. 

Referring to FIG. 1, the booster vaccine results in the body producing spike antigen that is now present in the blood/lymph.  One arm of an IgG (Top) binds to the top of the spike antigen (1).  One arm of an IgG (Bottom) binds to the bottom of the same spike antigen (1).  The second arm of an IgG (Bottom) binds to another spike antigen (2).  One arm of a second IgG (Top) binds to the same spike antigen (2).  The second arm of the second IgG (Top) binds to a third spike antigen (3).  And the pattern can continue indefinitely, producing thick strands of antibody/antigen complexes.  There can be many separate “strings” of alternating IgG (Top) and IgG (Bottom) antibodies.  Can you see how this meshwork of strings is the basis for long gelatinous, clots?   The chances of this occurring with a real COVID virus infection is very low because the virus particle is too large to act as “glue” between alternating antibodies. 

There can be infinite variations of the resulting meshwork patterns and size that can emerge from strings of antibodies formed from the mix of IgG antibodies and IgM antibodies and the spike antigen that act as glue connecting 1) antibodies both IgG and IgM to the top of the spike antigen and 2) antibodies both IgG and IgM to the bottom/side of the spike antigen.  The strands of antibodies can be of variable length and some strands may form into balls not that different from balls of string.  It is not inconceivable that some of these “balls” of antibodies grow large enough to block blood vessels, with all the downstream damage from blocked blood flow. 

Lattice structures formed from immune complexes (antibodies binding to their respective antigen) are a well-known phenomenon and have been extensively studied.  Lattice structure formation is affected by many factors.  With the COVID spike antigen, we have an extremely unusual situation that dramatically increases the size and length of these structures.   With a natural COVID viral infection, antibodies are only formed to the top of the spike antigen.  However, free spike antigen generated following the COVID mRNA vaccine results in the production of at least two distinct antibodies, to the top and bottom of the spike antigen.   This creates a bizarre situation following administration of the booster COVID mRNA vaccine.   There are antibodies now present to the top of the spike antigen and to the bottom (or stalk portion) of the spike antigen.   

This opens the possibility for a never-ending weave of lattice structures or strings, until the respective antibodies and spike antigen becomes unavailable due to the formation of extensive lattice structures (and strings of variable length) which create extended clots. The chances of a COVID antibody molecule formed in response to the first COVID vaccine binding a natural COVID virus is at least a million times less than the chances of that same COVID antibody molecule combining with a spike antigen and being found within a meshwork of antibodies.  That is why I call this the “Lee string theory that is more fact than theory.” This is why the resulting meshwork of antibodies is the “MAIN EFFECT” of the booster COVID mRNA vaccine.  If a side effect of the COVID mRNA vaccine occurred as infrequently as the chance of their COVID antibody binding a COVID virus in the lung, the vaccine scientists would not even list it as a “side effect.”  Again, this is exactly why I state that this string formation of antibodies IS THE MAIN EFFECT of the COVID mRNA vaccine. 

It is well known that immune complex clearance is affected by the size of the lattice structure.  Because of the unusual situation with the free spike antigen resulting in production of at least two different antibodies, immune complexes can criss-cross and form alternating connections with other immune complexes, in ways that would be extremely unlikely if only antibodies to the top of the spike antigen are present. The larger the meshwork of antibodies with spike antigen as the glue connecting the various antibodies, the more unlikely that the normal clearance mechanism can be effective. 

The chances of a “double immune complex” forming is much less because if a TOP antibody has two spike antigens bound, one to each arm, for the BOTTOM antibodies two arms to reach the bottom of each spike antigen, the binding would be limited by the angle that the arm projects out, since the body of the antibody would have to be parallel in at least one view, to the TOP antibody.    

Similar to how pine needles and leaves can clog gutters and prevent water flow, strings of antibodies, platelets, white blood cells, red blood cells, and coagulation activation can create blockage of blood vessels all over the body.  All you have to do is imagine how your shower drain can be blocked by strands of hair and gunk.   

This mechanism ONLY uses facts that are so widely acknowledged that the COVID mRNA vaccine should be immediately HALTED.  For example, I have a theory that if I throw a banana off the roof of my house, it will fall to the ground.  I have NEVER studied this.  I have done NO research trials on this theory.  Yet, I am certain that the banana will fall.  In exactly the same way, the chances of an antibody to the spike from the first vaccine actually binding to a real COVID virus is less than 1 in a 1000, probably less than 1 in a million.  But the chances of that same antibody from the first vaccine binding to a spike antigen from the second vaccine is almost guaranteed.   Strands/chains of alternating antibodies are definitely being formed.   How large that meshwork is will vary from patient to patient.  At a certain critical threshold of meshwork size, clots will form.  Again,  strand formation is NOT a side effect.  It is in fact the “MAIN EFFECT” of the vaccine to produce an antibody that WILL bind to the spike antigen from the second vaccine.    

Without being informed of this breaking new information, it is not possible for a single physician on earth to provide proper informed consent to a prospective COVID vaccine patient.  It is NOT my responsibility to perform the additional research to vet this issue;  it is the undisputed obligation of the manufacturers of the vaccine (those who make the profit). They listed “clots” as a “side effect” in their warning labels.  If the “side effect” of strand formation occurs much more frequently than the “main effect” of the antibody binding to a COVID virus, shouldn’t they be required to UPDATE their warning labels AND report this breaking information to the FDA? 

Children in the US receive up to 20 boosters before the age of 4.   Half of these booster use vaccines with antigens that can act as glue.  Then, under the age of 4, children are exposed to booster vaccines 10 times that can drastically increase their likelihood of clots.  A clot in a capillary in brain tissue can cause a personality change, or autism.  The potential risk of autism is not from a strange ingredient in the vaccines.   These chains of alternating antibodies that can form clots, this theory ONLY uses antibodies and antigens.    

Everyone who receives this information and has some influence must do the right thing and immediately call for a HALT to all vaccines using an antigen molecule that is small enough so a single IgG antibody can bind to two antigen molecules, one arm of the IgG antibody to one antigen molecule and the second arm to another antigen molecule.  When an antigen molecule is not larger than this described size, it can act as glue between alternating antibodies and form chains of antibodies that can drastically increase the chances of clot formation.  For this letter, I will refer to this as a “glue antigen.” 

There isn’t a parent on earth who would let their child receive a vaccine booster if they knew this was not just a very rare possibility, but the likely main effect of every booster vaccine with an antigen that is sufficiently small (half the vaccines on earth).  If in 200 years of vaccine science, vaccinologists haven’t considered this simple mechanism for clots, then there are a lot of questions that must be asked and answered before vaccines using “glue antigens” are permitted.  

Please do the right thing. If you have questions or concerns, please email me back or call me at 213 327 8869. 

Thank you, 

Regards 

/joseph lee/ 

Electronic signature 

Joseph Lee 

And my Tweets to him on October 6, 2023.

Dr. Oltz, I emailed you and your colleagues. I will also send by certified mail. I have a critical update for you. I show how strands of alternating antibodies to the spike antigen cause clots. The spike antigen acts as glue to the different antibodies.

I am reaching out to you because this is the exact mechanism causing clots after the booster COVID mRNA vaccine. This is the exact mechanism that caused clots with the J&J vaccine. It is a matter of critical importance and I think this info should be published in your journal

This "String Theory" only uses guaranteed facts. 1. The spike antigen has multiple antigenic sites. 2. Multiple antibodies will form to the spike antigen. 3. Chains of alternating antibodies forming with the spike antigen acting as glue is a guaranteed result.

As a physician, you understand that if a mother understands the ramifications of this discovery, even without more clinical data, no mother on earth would vaccinate their child with the COVID mRNA vaccine. It is not possible for a physician to provide proper informed consent--

if a physician does not have this diagram and explanation. But, this goes beyond the COVID mRNA vaccine. Every childhood vaccine that uses an antigen small enough so that two two separate antigen molecules can bind to one IgG antibody, has this risk.

If I have a theory that if I throw a banana off my roof, that it will fall splat on the ground, the theory uses scientific laws so certain, that I can be certain the banana WILL fall, even if I have NEVER done a single experiment to test this theory.

And the problem is, your Journal should take the ethical, morally responsible action, which is to call for an immediate world-wide halt to all vaccines with antigens that fall under this size criteria. EVEN if this is ONLY a theory so far. The mechanism is TIGHT.

There is PLENTY of data to show that clots result from the vaccine. The anti vaxxers call this the "clot shot." It is NEVER a good idea NOT to listen to patients when a procedure is done. Half the US calls this the "clot shot" and I found the mechanism --

connecting YOUR vaccine to clots. Meshwork of alternating antibodies glued by your spike antigen. Platelets trapped in the meshwork. FC regions of the antibodies activating FC receptors on platelets. This is all YOUR SCIENCE and YOUR LANGUAGE and YOUR LOGIC.

But, if NO ONE on the pro vaccine side ever does the right thing, do you think the general public will EVER believe what scientists say?? If I am rude, I AM in a hurry because children WILL be getting this clot shot, correct? And please don't use my rudeness as an excuse.

This ONE DIAGRAM should HALT half the booster vaccines on earth the MOMENT your journal includes my Diagram in a tweet to the Chief Editor, should it not? Until the data on my hypothesis comes out and until their is a reasonable scientific rebuttal, correct?

Being in a rush can always look like rudeness. But, flip and consider how YOU would feel if YOU were ME and discovered this. You would be on FIRE maybe MORE than me, because you KNOW the significance of discovering this mechanism of strands of alternating antibodies.

ah, you know I don't like to bring up the legal ramifications of this, but you DO realize the Journal of Immunology will face potential lawsuits for BURYING a story this big and so you should act in patients best interests but ALSO in your Journal's best interests.

and maybe, just maybe, if you don't do the right thing, the owner of your journal may later sue YOU. Yeah, it gets bizarre. but guess what? When you MANDATE something you know THIS LITTLE about, why wouldn't you expect lawsuits and a bizarro world?