Harvard university. Teaching them how to do basic science. Will they apologize after they've injured their own students with their vaccine mandate?

@Harvard Harvard.

Please don't think I'm just picking on you for no reason. If your institution is this stupid? Then we truly are living in an idiocracy and sure, you're the smartest school in this idiot world then. good for you.

@Harvard Here's my very long thread to you yesterday.

But, damn. What would YOU do if you were me? and you could make FUN of the supposedly SMARTEST school on earth? So, go for it, right? keep at it? show you all how dumb you really are? Sure, since you all insist.

@Harvard Oh, and please don't forget my bill. As previously agreed upon, it's $2000 per post. My time is valuable.

Here's the thread from yesterday, about a 100 posts, which is shit, might be a bit much $200,000

@Harvard But remember what I do for you, Harvard. I keep you from STUPIDLY negating your liability insurance via the PREP ACT which can ALSO, NEGATE your liability insurance for your VERY STUPID vaccine mandate.

@Harvard yeah, that one's INFINITELY more costly than my advice to you.

Harvard. It is TIME. It is TIME to PUBLICLY APOLOGIZE for the COVID vaccine mandate and to explain EXACTLY WHY you are apologizing.@Harvard Harvard.https://josephyleemd.substack.com/p/harvard-it-is-time-it-is-time-to

@Harvard & all my fees to you? You could EASILY make that all back up just starting a CLASS with me teaching it as FULL PROFESSOR, explaining how science is done PROPERLY. How's that?

So, isn't this the TRUMP, WIN/WIN deal he's always talking about? I think I would make Trump proud

@Harvard Okay, enough of the small talk.

Here's how you do PROPER science. Who cares if I don't sound smart like you idiots. I get it right.

I PURPOSEFULLY want to sound LESS academic.
Just the SNEER of the academic verbage rubs me the wrong way. Don't like the stink of it.

@Harvard Harvard University. You shoud REALLY have been promoting my thread tonite because anyone who wants to know how to do science properly? would NEVER hear a lecture THIS good in their WHOLE FUCKING life.

@Harvard The proper understanding of Science is acknowledging that there is only ONE reality.

You start there. Fuck the multiverse idiots.

Then, science starts with a HYPOTHESIS.

We don't have all night, so we're going to limit this science talk to the BIOLOGICAL sciences.

@Harvard Okay, what's a HYPOTHESIS? Because if you don't have one, you're almost GUARANTEED to be a RAIN DANCER (more on that later).

Connecting the dots between the CAUSE and the EFFECT is what a hypothesis is and for us today? the dots are JUST MOLECULES and nothing more detailed.

@Harvard Now, did you get that. Because if u can't connect the molecules from CAUSE to EFFECT?

You may NOT HAVE THE PROPER CAUSE. Meaning, a FALSE CAUSE.

This is the WORST nightmare for any scientist.

Being under the spell of a FALSE CAUSE. You could say they're SHITTY scientists

@Harvard Do you understand the meaning of the word GREY? Harvard University? Becuz you guys are so WOKE you became BLIND to differences, shades of grey. And without being able to compare SHADES OF GREY, you're just fucking MORONS.

@Harvard Oh, you think I'm sad because I don't have a huge following?

LMAO. I'm writing this for ALL FUTURE SCIENTISTS who will ALL appreciate this fucking lecture.

@Harvard I'm NOT rambling. I DO have a most EXCELLENT point.

Does a scientist ALWAYS need a hypothesis?

Meaning, JUST because we can't connect the molecules from cause to effect, does that mean the CAUSE is WRONG? CLEARLY NOT.

@Harvard This is how we determine WHEN a HYPOTHESIS is MORE IMPORTANT to have? and when it's NOT as important to have a PERFECT HYPOTHESIS in the biological sciences.

Keep reading. It's not that hard. You'll understand it soon enough.

@Harvard The CAUSE of "general anesthesia" results in the EFFECT of "unconsciousness" within 7 seconds or so? give or take a second?

When the TIME between the CAUSE and the EFFECT is very short? You do NOT have to have a PERFECT HYPOTHESIS to know you have the REAL CAUSE.

@Harvard FUCK, though. What about when the TIME between the CAUSE (vaccine) and the EFFECT (not getting seriously ill from COVID) is up to 3, 6, 9 months apart???????

Do you NEED a GOOD HYPOTHESIS THEN? ABSOLUTELY FUCKING YES!!!!!!!!!

@Harvard Do u UNDERSTAND the GREY in that?

A VERY GOOD HYPOTHESIS is CRITICAL WHEN THE CAUSE and EFFECT are separated FAR apart in time.

DO U GET that if you do NOT have a HYPOTHESIS with this THREE MONTH span, that you may have a FALSE CAUSE ON YOUR HANDS?

Ah, a dim light coming on?

@Harvard You SEE why you want a VERY GOOD HYPOTHESIS in BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES?

Because MOST purported CAUSES and later EFFECT is often FAR SEPARATED in time, UNLIKE general anesthesia.

and? do you REALLY want HARVARD to be the institution that thinks like RAIN DANCERS?

@Harvard You see, ONCE the AMOUNT OF TIME between CAUSE and EFFECT is this LARGE? span of MONTHS? Then, being able to CONNECT all those molecules over that time span??? RISKY BUSINESS. INFINITLEY more likely that you're a RAIN DANCER, if all you have is DATA and no HYPOTHESIS.

@Harvard NO ONE is disagreeing. You all have a SHIT LOAD of stupid PEER REVIEWED papers (all the peers are connected to BIG PHARMA, probably).

Please remember. RAIN DANCERS had a 100% accuracy. It DID always rain. They had TONS of data, JUST like you Harvard Folk.

@Harvard Now, I DID say you have to have a FLAWLESS HYPOTHESIS when you're trying to get ALL THE GLORY that the RAIN DANCERS also tried to get by doing their highly ceremonial, complex dance, not much different from your vaccine scientists.

Where is that HYPOTHESIS for the COVID vax?

@Harvard Please, I spent ALL this time explaining how to do PROPER SCIENCE and the URGENT need for a nearly PERFECT HYPOTHESIS when you're talking about, you know, predicting what will happen to one person six months later. You guys are sure you can do that. I'm not, at ALL.

@Harvard FUCK, harvard. HAND IT OVER.

I NEED that HYPOTHESIS for the COVID vaccine.

How ELSE can anyone ASSESS whether you in fact DO have a PROPER HYPOTHESIS which is SOOOOO important when the TIME SPAN between CAUSE and EFFECT is SIX MONTHS????

@Harvard Oh, goodness. Harvard? You can't even STATE the hypothesis for how the COVID vaccine works?

Wow. Just a minute. Then, aren't you JUST like the RAIN DANCERS? NO HYPOTHESIS?

WANT to take ALL the CREDIT for some GOOD result (rain, recover from COVID)?

@Harvard When you all had NOTHING TO DO with the RAIN coming down?

Or in THIS version, YOU ALL had NOTHING TO DO with how the human body HEALED us from COVID???

But you all DID take FUCKING CREDIT for SAVING LIVES?

Please. Tell me, that you HAVE A HYPOTHESIS that you can STATE.

@Harvard Wow, I almost called Harvard University, "you dummies." You were THIS easily swayed by just DATA, rain dance stye DATA, "approved" by the SAME "peers," and you can't even state a summary of your hypothesis for the COVID vaccine BIOWEAPON?

@Harvard I feel for you. THIS idiotic on the world stage? and you can NEVER pretend that you didn't MANDATE this bioweapon on your WHOLE student body? As if you had a desire to HURT and KILL your own STUDENTS?

@Harvard So embarrassing. I mean, you have access to the internet? just LOOK UP the damn hypothesis.

You all were SOOOOO certain that the vaccine was GOOD for everyone? You MUST know what the HYPOTHESIS is for HOW the COVID vaccine provides BENEFIT? Where's your dunce cap?

@Harvard Just so we're all on the same page. U all DO GET that the rain dancers DANCE had NOTHING to do with causing the guaranteed RAIN that would ALWAYS come? They had PLENTY of PERFECT data, just like YOU dummies, CORRECT? Yet we all know that the RAIN DANCE was a FALSE CAUSE, YES?

@Harvard It's such BASIC science and I get PAID $2000 by HARVARD UNIVERSITY for EDUCATING them on this MOST BASIC SCIENCE?

Love to embarrass PRETENDERS who think you're ALL THAT and what u have? just some CEREMONIAL BULLSHIT crap that INJURES and KILLS as the MAIN EFFECT.

@Harvard Being EXTREMELY embarrassed in front of the world and CORRECT is INFINITELY better than

BEING PROUD and HAUGHTY and FUCKING WRONG while INJURING/KILLING your student body,

RIGHT?

@Harvard TAKE your FUCKING MEDICINE and APOLOGIZE to the WORLD for NOT even HAVING a basic HYPOTHESIS and YET so CERTAIN that you're HELPING PEOPLE all the while INJURING/KILLING them with your fucking STUPID vaccine mandate.

@Harvard To be WRONG for YEARS on such a SIMPLE ethical issue (bodily autonomy, don't pretend you don't know what that is) is one thing.

To CONTINUE to be WRONG because you're so FUCKING HUMILIATED and EMBARRASSED to be wrong? DUMBNESS on ANOTHER LEVEL.

@Harvard YOU finally GET IT? the IMPORTANCE of having a VERY TIGHT almost PERFECT hypothesis when you're trying to connect your IDIOTIC COVID vaccine (the FALSE CAUSE) to a person's LESS SEVERE COVID case six months later??? CONNECT those molecules for me. DO IT NOW. DUMMIES.

@Harvard The WORLD should see this. That getting a fucking degree from HARVARD?

Means DUMMIES on THIS level picked YOUR application out of this HUGE pile of VERY COMPETENT students and it makes NO FUCKING DIFFERENCE whether you were PICKED or NOT PICKED by morons on THIS LEVEL.

@Harvard Now, since I don't want to be SUED by IDIOTS who are THIS embarrassed, if I'm WRONG? TELL ME HOW and I'll CORRECT any TYPOS I made, GET IT? and you DO HAVE the FREEDOM to FUCKING BLOCK ME, which will ALWAYS be my DEFENSE in case you losers decide to SUE ME.

@Harvard and the potential FUTURE JURY should know.

What I'm delivering here? WORDS.

What YOUR dumb UNIVERSITY delivered to your OWN student body?

A VACCINE that had the MAIN EFFECT of INJURING/KILLING students, if the STRING mechanism can't be REFUTED.

@Harvard Here's your HYPOTHESIS for how the COVID vaccine provides benefit.

A neutralizing COVID antibody in the lung air space that NEUTRALIZES the COVID virus before the COVID virus can infect lung cells.

Oh, but that stupid HYPOTHESIS is so EASILY destroyed.

@Harvard Remember what a HYPOTHESIS is for. So you don't LOOK like a RAIN DANCER and you aren't FOOLED by a FALSE CAUSE.

And a HYPOTHESIS connects the MOLECULES all the way from the purported CAUSE (the vaccine) to you being LESS SICK from COVID (the ADJUSTED EFFECT, AFTER THE FACT).

@Harvard It's like, WHO WOULDN'T just ROLL THOSE EYES if the raindancers said, Hey we didn't say it would rain a LOT, the SPRINKLING for a few hours DOES COUNT as our "effect."

That's what YOU ALL said, to try to ESCAPE the fucking HUMILIATING embarrassment of being SO FUCKING WRONG.

@Harvard The HYPOTHESIS is SUPER CRITICAL to AVOID looking like a TOTAL MORON and falling for a FALSE CAUSE because it CONNECTS the CAUSE with MOLECULES all the way to the EFFECT.

Problem here? The LUNG barrier stands in the way of your ANTIBODY and the COVID virus in the lung air space

@Harvard Yeah, that pretty much DESTROYS the hypothesis that you couldn't even STATE because to CONNECT the DOTS? or the MOLECULES in the biological sciences? You actually have to have a PATH for the molecules ALL THE WAY from the purported CAUSE to the purported EFFECT.

@Harvard In response to your COVID vaccine? COVID IgG antibodies are produced on the OUTSIDE of this blood/lung barrier. The lung cells infected by COVID? On the INSIDE of this blood/lung barrier.

This lung barrier? can stop WATER molecules that are 18 Daltons in size.

@Harvard The COVID IgG antibody molecule size? A whopping 145,000 Daltons. NOT a small mistake.

A HUGE COLOSSAL mistake. EVERY alveolus in your body? all 300 million of them? EACH alveolar wall CAN stop your DUMB COVID IgG antibody from entering the lung air space.

@Harvard So guess what? YOU ALL are NO DIFFERENT FROM RAIN DANCERS with your COVID vaccine mandate. YOU HAVE NO HYPOTHESIS but you DAMN SURE PROVED TO the world that you DO WANT TO TAKE CREDIT with a vaccine that INJURES/KILLS as the main effect. STUPIDITY on an IDIOCRACY level.

@Harvard I informed Fauci of this TERRIBLE oversight back in SEPTEMBER 2020. He is a TRUE IDIOT and the OPPOSITE of a scientist and his UTTERLY dumb reply via Dr. Emily Erbelding is proof of what an idiot he is.

Dr. Emily Erbelding, Director of NIH Infectious Disease, in response to Dr. Joseph Leeresponding to my letter to Dr. Anthony Fauci, explaining the fatal flaw with the COVID vaccinehttps://josephyleemd.substack.com/p/dr-emily-erbelding-director-of-nih

@Harvard and because Fauci's response was so IDIOTIC, I explained this SIMPLE lung barrier issue which I summarized for you in two posts? I STRETCHED it out into 73 pages and covered EVERY possible question that anyone might have. I even put a copyright on it. Back in FEB 2021.

@Harvard This document will put Fauci in prison for life and RUIN his reputation. He deserves INFINITELY worse but the law isn't equipped to handle mass killers on this level.

US copyright. No. TXu002243916, 2021-02-03
73 pages
img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/1a1e…

@Harvard Fauci's team was CEARLY caught off guard but they didn't want to STOP the vaccine roll out.

So they referenced a 1985 article? By Wagner? a 35 year old article? to JUSTIFY vaccinating billions of people all over the world? THIS is how you all were SO certain you were helping?

@Harvard and even WAGNER states that "transudation" which was how FAUCI/ERBELDING jumped to explain this COLOSSAL mistake in their hypothesis? Even WAGNER states that transudation is SIMPLE DIFFUSION and diffusion of LARGE molecules greater than a 100,000 Daltons is LESS than 1%?

@Harvard COMPARING WELL is the essence of intelligence.

The liberal mindset PREVENTS the ability to compare well because you all don't want to SEE differences. Sorry, JUST because you don't want to see it does NOT mean differences don't exist.

@Harvard The liberal mindset of WANTING TO BE NICE ultimately ends with the INJURING/KILLING of MILLIONS of people all over the world.

SPARE the MEAN WORDS and you get KILLING by DUMMIES like Fauci.

@Harvard The liberal mindset of wanting to PRETEND HELP and virtue signal clouds your thinking SO badly that you will ACCEPT that a mask that has pores of 300 nanometers and gaps of 1,000,000 nanometers will stop a virus that is a 100 nanometers in diameter, BUT --

@Harvard that stupid mindset of wanting to HELP and not wanting to see differences, PREVENTED you dummies from seeing that a LUNG BARRIER that can stop TINY water molecules will ALLOW a COVID IgG molecule that is 8000 times LARGER, to willy nilly CROSS this tight lung barrier.

COMPARE.

@Harvard IF Fauci's professors in school had JUST been HONEST and told him how BADLY he SUCKED at simple diffusion/membrane science, and FAILED the FUCKER, we wouldn't be here.

@Harvard Now, your institution was MORE than willing to PROMOTE this fucking SHITTY vaccine and MORE than willing to MANDATE it.

Part of your PENANCE to correct your wrongdoing?

Is to APOLOGIZE to the WORLD for your STUPIDITY in mandating this crap. and with that apology?

@Harvard EXPLAIN that PEDIATRICIANS all over the world? IF the String mechanism is IRREFUTABLE?

Pediatricians all over the world have been INJURING/KILLING children as the MAIN EFFECT of HALF THEIR VACCINES.

Do some FUCKING GOOD for all the HARM that you've inflicted on humanity.

@Harvard My RUDE language is a problem?? FUCK, you all FORCED/MANDATED CRAP and went along with SHUTTING UP the opposing view.

It feels GOOD to fucking curse you all out. And my cursing? COMPARE MY RUDE words to your RUDE FUCKING ACTIONS.

@Harvard LET ME summarize for you DUMMIES managing Harvard University.

I'm TELLING YOU that your hypothesis is FATALLY FLAWED and when the TIME SPAN between PURPORTED CAUSE and NONSTOP GOALPOST CHANGING EFFECT is on the order of MONTHS?

NO HYPOTHESIS means you're a FUCKING RAIN DANCER.

@Harvard Well, without a doubt. The pandemic exposed a million organizations, including Harvard.

My next thread to your Board of Trustees/Dean/CEO? I predict the future and depending on your actions? Future murder charges.