and the MOST frustrating thing for me? I call out THEIR stupidity in overlooking that the neutralizing antibody has no path into the lung. they have no response. the idiots lower down excuse it by saying, the immune system is more complex than you know. I GET THAT. --
I'm the ones TELLING THEM they have NO IDEA how it works and they just come back with, IT IS COMPLEX. I say, WRITE IT DOWN. EXPLAIN IT. GO REPEAT YOUR FDA EUA PROCESS SINCE YOU GOT YOUR FIRST EUA based on a neutralizing antibody in the LUNG. and they never can explain it.
and the concept of "training" and "memory" is what I use against them. There are well over 300 million lung alveolar epithelial cell. I tell them, where are your trained white blood cells? I'll ASSUME for YOU that they are TRAINED. then, 300 million lung cells --
300 million lung cells would HAVE to be INTERVIEWED by these "trained" white cells since one viral strand can easily become 50,000 virus particles in ONE infected lung cell. And you have to describe HOW that trained white cell determines WHICH lung cells to kill. --
you are NOT just allowed to say the human organism is TRAINED. you have to DETAIL EXPLAIN IT so it makes LOGICAL SENSE. WHERE IS THE TRAINING? If it's in white cells, the INTERVIEWING process is IMPOSSIBLE. If the "training" is in a molecule, there is ONLY one molecule--
only ONE molecule type, the antibodies, that have ANY evidence of being "trained" by a past infection and having "memory". Interferon molecules and chemokines do NOT. so, they have NO clue on how this "training" occurs. they ALWAYS discuss "TRAINING" but can't even--
they can't even BEGIN to explain in the most BASIC terms HOW this "training" occurs and can't explain the MOST basic flow of the strategy implemented by either trained white cells or trained molecules, in a recurrent infection. It is BIZARRE to me --
it is BIZARRE that the ONLY thing the jabbers will say, is that you "learned" from the vaccine. but NO ONE can elucidate HOW this occurs? and when I exposed the stupidity of the "trained molecule" portion of this "training", the only answer? you don't know. WHO DOES????
and I do NOT know because I do NOT think it's possible. I PROPOSE the most BASIC possibilities, that of TRAINED WHite cells that go INTERVIEW and destroy or NOT destroy infected cells, but the logistics of that process demonstrate it is VIRTUALLY IMPOSSIBLE.
So, what is OBVIOUS to me now is this. THEY DO NOT HAVE AN ANSWER. they did NOT even do what I did, create a possible (impossible) hypothesis of HOW this "training" would manifest in a real re-infection. THEY HAVE NO ANSWER, NO HYPOTHESIS, JUST, "it is complex".
and the most fundamental reason why the "trained" white cell interviewing 300 million lung cells (minimum) and killing off the lung cells that are tooo infected, the reason why this is VIRTUALLY impossible, because it would have to be REPEATED every TWO OR THREE DAYS.

This should be shared widely and hopefully it spreads like wildfire. My guess is it won't because of lazy thinking and/or brainwa... errr, that is, commitment to orthodoxy, even when it doesn't make sense. I have seen a couple doctors, apparently borrowing portions of your theory. Anyway, good luck. I will do my part to share.
Where is the excess deaths in the USA or Israel? Both countries vaccinated before UK and Israel heavily boosted.