@imdrped @BtfSpirit @TabithaGoldbaum @Support @elonmusk @AmerAcadPeds Let me be clear about who is crazy here.
I wouldn't have to talk to idiots like you IF the vaccine was NEVER mandated.
I'm NOT on the side that FORCED people to take a vaccine or LOSE THEIR job.
YOUR side did that. How am I THE CRAZY ONE? You're literally RETARDED and crazy.
The ONLY argument for the mandate was that it was good for the group, a weak legal argument, but the ONLY argument your side DID have was that if you did NOT take the vaccine, you could spread DEATH.
that's why YOUR side ILLEGALLY mandated the vaccine. With that shitty thinking
I wouldn't have to be here talking to your dumbass IF YOUR side had NOT ILLEGALLY mandated a vaccine that produced an antibody that didn't even have a PATH into the lung air space.
your ONLY argument now? to pretend that someone who DID take the vaccine had LESS severe issues?
YOU have NO right to determine HOW someone dies.
People can drink themselves to death slowly by drinking more alchohol than they should. NOT DRINKING clearly INCREASES someones life span.
SO WHAT. U DO NOT GET TO DECIDE HOW SOMEONE DIES.
EVEN that ridiculously stupid argument, which IS the ONLY argument your side had?
THAT ARGUMENT WENT OUT THE WINDOW when Pfizer ADMITTED almost two years ago that they "did not check for prevention of transmission"
THE ONLY ARGUMENT YOUR SIDE HAD???? OUT THE WINDOW.
PEOPLE take on HIGH RISK (to life) activities ALL THE TIME.
1. hang gliding
2. surfing
3. scuba diving
4. sky diving
5. any kind of jumping off of anything
6. risky sex, chance of getting HIV.
YOU NAME IT PEOPLE DO IT.
So if SOMEONE wants to die from SEVERE COVID, that is THEIR RIGHT,
CORRECT YOU SNAKE???
YOU CRAZY DUMMY?
IF you think you know MORE than Pfizer and YOU believe that the vaccine DID prevent TRANSMISSION, WHERE ARE YOUR DAMN PEER REVIEWED STUDIES TO PROVE THAT?
You DUMMY.
and you want INCREDIBLE proof beyond the PERFECT mechanism that I provide for how the vaccine IS RISK
Let me ask YOU. You are SURE that the VACCINE reduce SEVERITY of illness.
Do you just BELIEVE all the CRAP that you read in your peer-reviewed published papers?
Did you REPLICATE that data? Because per NATURE (article 15 yrs ago that started the REPLICATION CRISIS) --
Only the data from HALF of all peer reviewed published papers can be REPLICATED.
DO YOU KNOW WHICH HALF? HOW? ARE YOU SURE?
and the ONLY thing you have to show "decreased severity of illness" is DATA. Your side just collected DATA. YOU AMASSED DATA.
and was the study to prove LESS SEVERE SIDE effects, was it WELL CONTROLLED? No, you just BUNDLED a bunch of people who all had an INFINITELY different set of pre-existing conditions and you just BUNDLED THEM TOGETHER and you have DATA. SO UCKING WHAT.
scientists STILL can't figure out if WINE is GOOD or BAD for you and they've been studying that FOREVER.
YOU SURE that your DATA to PROVE that the VAX REDUCES severity of illness is GOOD DATA??? LMAO.
There's a MILLION ways to fudge THAT kind of DATA.
THAT IS WHY we do NOT believe the RAIN DANCERS who had MORE DATA and a BETTER TRACK RECORD than YOU IDIOT vaccinologists.
AT LEAST the rain dancers KNEW that for it to be a PROPER "temporal correlation," the CAUSE, even if FAKE, MUST COME BEFORE THE RAIN.
With the COVID antibody,
didn't it show up AFTER everyone RECOVERED in 2020???
You guys are THIS SHITTY at SCIENCE. You can't even get a PROPER TEMPORAL CORRELATION going, that even the RAIN DANCERS knew better than YOUR SCIENTISTS.
DUMB UCK. You've got a REVERSE TEMPORAL CORRELATION and a BUNCH OF DATA that YOUR SIDE PUT TOGETHER and YOUR PEERS reviewed and YOUR JOURNALS published.
who the UCK CARES about THAT shittiness.
You only have BAD DATA BUNDLED TOGETHER. That is a PERVERSION OF SCIENCE, you DUMB ASS.
when it comes to showing any RISK for the vaccine, you need PERFECT elegant science. And I delivered it. and you're BLIND to it.
When it comes to showing any BENEFIT for the vaccine, yeah, even the HAIR that grew back in your GROWING nose, ABSOLUTELY cuz of the vax. MORON
Love your replies Dr.
If I were 30 years younger, I'd ask you to marry me