To Alcock, Patricia L.
<Patricia.Alcock@fda.hhs.gov>Loney.NUNEMAKER@FDA.HHS.GovThomas.HUGHES@FDA.HHS.GovErin.FERGUSON@FDA.HHS.GovMichelle.Gamble@fda.hhs.govKristin.Hughes@fda.hhs.govBCCArdell.Jackson@fda.hhs.govJill.Sooter@fda.hhs.govMelanie.BoneyMilliken@fda.hhs.govDeena.DAddario@fda.hhs.govDawn.Hall@fda.hhs.govBrent.Higgs@fda.hhs.govDeirdra.Holloway@fda.hhs.govKimberly.Hull@fda.hhs.govMelissa.Vorobyev@fda.hhs.govRenee.WILKES@FDA.HHS.Gov
Thursday, October 12th, 2023 at 8:31 PM
Dear FDA Directors,
If your email is on the cc or bcc list, this email is also directed at you. Most of you received a lot of emails from me early in the pandemic. www.lungvirus.com.
All of you infuriated me because I told you many you, if not one scientist at the FDA can explain how a gargantuan 145,000 Dalton IgG COVID antibody molecule could pass through the lung barrier, which can stop water molecules, then the COVID vaccine hypothesis of a neutralizing antibody in the lung space is BROKEN. But, that's yesterday's news. Now, I found something even more serious that affects half the vaccines on earth.
This email discloses a simple mechanism that shows exactly how clots form after a COVID mRNA vaccine booster. This mechanism shows that CLOT formation is almost guaranteed, the only uncertainty is how LARGE the clots will be.
I am fairly certain that if you don't do the correct thing, by the time the public finds out you were informed, it is unlikely that you will be able to keep your job.
Sorry in advance because none of you did the right thing when I sent you my prior information regarding the blood lung barrier and antibody size. Now? I have no sympathy for you when the public decides that you should no longer be a director at the FDA.
Regards,
Joe Lee
Hide original message
------- Forwarded Message -------
From: Joe Lee, MD <joeleemd@protonmail.com>
Date: On Thursday, October 12th, 2023 at 6:14 PM
Subject: Critical Update Mechanism for CLOTS following booster vaccines.
To: jbc7@cdc.gov <jbc7@cdc.gov>, yyy8@cdc.gov <yyy8@cdc.gov>, Lawrence.Tabak@nih.hhs.gov <Lawrence.Tabak@nih.hhs.gov>, emily.erbelding@nih.hhs.gov <emily.erbelding@nih.hhs.gov>, tucker.carlson@foxnews.com <tucker.carlson@foxnews.com>
To the CDC Director, Dr. Mandy Cohen,
This is critical information re: a nightmare design flaw with the COVID mRNA vaccine resulting in CLOTS.
This is the preface to the 156 page letter attached here. The most important section is the “Lee String Theory.” This String Theory will end half the vaccines on earth this year. This is a matter of utmost importance for protecting American lives and protecting our children.
It is the simplest theory. When you are infected with a COVID virus, since the Spike antigen is attached to the virus particle, you do not form antibodies against the bottom of the spike antigen, you DO form antibodies to the top of the spike antigen.
In a vaccine setting, you have free spike antigen in the blood and lymph and you form antibodies to the TOP of the spike and ALSO to the BOTTOM of the spike antigen. There is no dispute that there are MULTIPLE antigenic sites on the Spike antigen.
Prior to receiving a booster vaccine, we all agree that, without a doubt, these three components are in the blood.
COVID antibodies to the top of the spike antigen are present.
COVID antibodies to the bottom of the spike antigen are present.
Once, the booster is given, spike antigen is added to the above two antibodies. Following a booster COVID mRNA vaccine given within a few months of the first COVID mRNA vaccine, there will be present in the blood at the same time; COVID antibodies to the top of the spike antigen, COVID antibodies to the bottom of the spike antigen, and spike antigen. No vaccine scientist on earth can dispute these three points.
Referring to FIG. 1, the booster vaccine results in the body producing spike antigen that is now present in the blood/lymph. One arm of an IgG (Top) binds to the top of the spike antigen (1). One arm of an IgG (Bottom) binds to the bottom of the same spike antigen (1). The second arm of an IgG (Bottom) binds to another spike antigen (2). One arm of a second IgG (Top) binds to the same spike antigen (2). The second arm of the second IgG (Top) binds to a third spike antigen (3). And the pattern can continue indefinitely, producing thick strands of antibody/antigen complexes. There can be many separate “strings” of alternating IgG (Top) and IgG (Bottom) antibodies. Can you see how this meshwork of strings is the basis for long gelatinous, clots? The chances of this occurring with a real COVID virus infection is very low because the virus particle is too large to act as “glue” between alternating antibodies.
There can be infinite variations of the resulting meshwork patterns and size that can emerge from strings of antibodies formed from the mix of IgG antibodies and IgM antibodies and the spike antigen that act as glue connecting 1) antibodies both IgG and IgM to the top of the spike antigen and 2) antibodies both IgG and IgM to the bottom/side of the spike antigen. The strands of antibodies can be of variable length and some strands may form into balls not that different from balls of string. It is not inconceivable that some of these “balls” of antibodies grow large enough to block blood vessels, with all the downstream damage from blocked blood flow.
Lattice structures formed from immune complexes (antibodies binding to their respective antigen) are a well-known phenomenon and have been extensively studied. Lattice structure formation is affected by many factors. With the COVID spike antigen, we have an extremely unusual situation that dramatically increases the size and length of these structures. With a natural COVID viral infection, antibodies are only formed to the top of the spike antigen. However, free spike antigen generated following the COVID mRNA vaccine results in the production of at least two distinct antibodies, to the top and bottom of the spike antigen. This creates a bizarre situation following administration of the booster COVID mRNA vaccine. There are antibodies now present to the top of the spike antigen and to the bottom (or stalk portion) of the spike antigen.
This opens the possibility for a never-ending weave of lattice structures or strings, until the respective antibodies and spike antigen becomes unavailable due to the formation of extensive lattice structures (and strings of variable length) which create extended clots. The chances of a COVID antibody molecule formed in response to the first COVID vaccine binding a natural COVID virus is at least a million times less than the chances of that same COVID antibody molecule combining with a spike antigen and being found within a meshwork of antibodies. That is why I call this the “Lee string theory that is more fact than theory.” This is why the resulting meshwork of antibodies is the “MAIN EFFECT” of the booster COVID mRNA vaccine. If a side effect of the COVID mRNA vaccine occurred as infrequently as the chance of their COVID antibody binding a COVID virus in the lung, the vaccine scientists would not even list it as a “side effect.” Again, this is exactly why I state that this string formation of antibodies IS THE MAIN EFFECT of the COVID mRNA vaccine.
It is well known that immune complex clearance is affected by the size of the lattice structure. Because of the unusual situation with the free spike antigen resulting in production of at least two different antibodies, immune complexes can criss-cross and form alternating connections with other immune complexes, in ways that would be extremely unlikely if only antibodies to the top of the spike antigen are present. The larger the meshwork of antibodies with spike antigen as the glue connecting the various antibodies, the more unlikely that the normal clearance mechanism can be effective.
The chances of a “double immune complex” forming is much less because if a TOP antibody has two spike antigens bound, one to each arm, for the BOTTOM antibodies two arms to reach the bottom of each spike antigen, the binding would be limited by the angle that the arm projects out, since the body of the antibody would have to be parallel in at least one view, to the TOP antibody.
Similar to how pine needles and leaves can clog gutters and prevent water flow, strings of antibodies, platelets, white blood cells, red blood cells, and coagulation activation can create blockage of blood vessels all over the body. All you have to do is imagine how your shower drain can be blocked by strands of hair and gunk.
This theory ONLY uses facts that are so widely acknowledged that the theory is more fact than theory. For example, I have a theory that if I throw a banana off the roof of my house, it will fall to the ground. I have NEVER studied this. I have done NO research trials on this theory. Yet, I am certain that the banana will fall. In exactly the same way, the chances of an antibody to the spike from the first vaccine actually binding to a real COVID virus is less than 1 in a 1000, probably less than 1 in a million. But the chances of an antibody from the first vaccine binding to a spike antigen from the second vaccine is almost guaranteed. Strands/chains of alternating antibodies are definitely being formed. How large that meshwork is will vary from patient to patient. At a certain critical threshold of meshwork size, clots will form. Again, the strand formation is NOT a side effect. It is in fact the “MAIN EFFECT” of the vaccine to produce an antibody that WILL bind to the spike antigen from the second vaccine.
Without being informed of this breaking new information, it is not possible for a single physician on earth to provide proper informed consent to a prospective COVID vaccine patient. It is NOT my responsibility to perform the additional research to vet this issue; it is the undisputed obligation of the manufacturers of the vaccine (those who make the profit). They listed “clots” as a “side effect” in their warning labels. If the “side effect” of strand formation occurs much more frequently than the “main effect” of the antibody binding to a COVID virus, shouldn’t they be required to UPDATE their warning labels AND report this breaking information to the FDA?
Children in the US receive up to 20 boosters before the age of 4. Half of these booster use vaccines with antigens that can act as glue. Then, under the age of 4, children are exposed to booster vaccines 10 times that can drastically increase their likelihood of clots. A clot in a capillary in brain tissue can cause a personality change, or autism. The potential risk of autism is not from a strange ingredient in the vaccines. These chains of alternating antibodies that can form clots, this theory ONLY uses antibodies and antigens.
Everyone who receives this information and has some influence must do the right thing and immediately call for a HALT to all vaccines using an antigen molecule that is small enough so a single IgG antibody can bind to two antigen molecules, one arm of the IgG antibody to one antigen molecule and the second arm to another antigen molecule. When an antigen molecule is not larger than this described size, it can act as glue between alternating antibodies and form chains of antibodies that can drastically increase the chances of clot formation. For this letter, I will refer to this as a “glue antigen.”
There isn’t a parent on earth who would let their child receive a vaccine booster if they knew this was not just a very rare possibility, but the likely main effect of every booster vaccine with an antigen that is sufficiently small (half the vaccines on earth). If in 200 years of vaccine science, vaccinologists haven’t considered this simple mechanism for clots, then there are a lot of questions that must be asked and answered before vaccines using “glue antigens” are permitted.
Please do the right thing. If you have questions or concerns, please email me back or call me at 213 327 8869.
Thank you,
Regards
/joseph lee/
Electronic signature
Joseph Lee
WOW. WOW. WOW. That's the picture in my brain I got after reading your twitter thread, ha 'thread'. This has been blowing my mind since you first posted it. I'll forward it on to every doctor, scientist & smart ppl trying to define what these clots are. Btw, have you seen the certified lab results Mike Adams posted from clots taken from deceased patients by embalmer Richard Herschman? Video is on Brighteon.com Mike Adams The Health Ranger channel. It's all over the place now. Only asking just in case.
Excellent, excellent theory & paper.
Thank you
I really appreciate your tenacity. Bless you!