Scott Halpern, MD/PhD. Bioethicist at PENN. Let's see if a BIOETHICIST at PENN can do the right thing.
@ScottHalpernMD @PennMedicine Scott. here's your first HUGE NON HYPOTHETICAL Medical ethical nightmare.
It involves the most MASSIVE DISCOVERY about vaccines, that they have the MAIN EFFECT of creating PRECIPITINS in blood that then cause ischemic damage.
@ScottHalpernMD @PennMedicine What is the ONLY ethical next step?
I'm sure you know what the correct answer is and I think you should have an AUDIENCE.
@PennMedCSO
@PennMedicine
@pennsurgery
@UPennTrauma
@kkariko
@WeissmanLab
@Penn
@PEnnDental
@ChildrensPhila
@PennCancer
@StefanBartaMD
@UPennAllergyImm
Here's the NIGHTMARE DISCOVERY for vaccines.
Unroll available on Thread Reader
How would ANYONE refute this?
Covid antibody in blood. Spike antigen in blood.
BOTH in the blood from the vaccine.
You will NEVER find a reputable scientist that states that this COVID antibody and this SPIKE antigen would NOT bind.
I've sent this information out to a MILLION vaccinologists over this past year, and I've put out over 95,000 Tweets in this ONE YEAR, trying to find ANYONE who can refute this.
But, NO ONE seems to be able to.
x.com/lasikeyecenter…
Legalities. Let's get those out of the way.
The PREP ACT provides you with vaccine activity legal immunity. However, it also includes a major exception. If you are involved in "willful misconduct" by acts of OMISSION OR COMMISSION, your "vaccine legal immunity will be negated
So, blocking me or muting me? Is a COVER UP of the most massive mistake in medical history and that act will constitute willful misconduct (obviously) and your organization can then be sued directly by patients harmed by the vaccine.
That's the law, Scott. I don't know you and I don't know how ethically you do behave, so this is my insurance that if you happen NOT to be a good person, then there are consequences for blocking and muting me.
I'm sure you understand.
You can't possible come up with a HYPOTHETICAL ETHICAL DILEMNA easier than this to answer correctly.
A massive flaw is discovered with childhood vaccines. The flaw ALSO exposes the CANDIDATE for POTUS to be a KILLER via her vaccine mandate.
What is the ONLY ETHICAL NEXT STEP?
You see how EASY this BIO ETHICAL DILEMNA really is?
Is there ANY other option but to PUBLICLY demand that pediatricians either REFUTE this STRING MECHANISM or if they can't, STOP those childhood vaccines?
How difficult is that. NOT AT ALL, right Scott Halpern?
Now, have u studied the SILENCE of good men?
Becuz, incredibly, in my 95,000 posts informing a million different pro vaxxers of this massive flaw?
NOT ONE even sent me back ONE SENTENCE to try to refute this MASSIVE FLAW.
Isn't DOING NOTHING when informed of this UNETHICAL?
IF you PUBLICLY CALL for PEDIATRICIANS to either REFUTE THIS or stop childhood vaccines,
then you will SAVE CHILDREN all over the world from newly discovered NIGHTMARISH FLAWS with childhood vaccines.
But, you will ALSO OUT HARRIS as a mass killer.
WHAT IS YOUR ETHICAL DUTY?
Is your ETHICAL DUTY to HELP a MASS KILLER HIDE what she's actually done with her vaccine mandate?
Because then you're throwing the HEALTH and SAFETY of CHILDREN WORLDWIDE OUT THE WINDOW, or UNDER THE BUS.
This isn't a hard ethical dilemma, is it.
If you had 500 students in your class, wouldn't ALL OF THEM, 100% get the answer correct?
That you MUST PROTECT CHILDREN from DANGEROUS vaccines, correct?
So, please call a press conference tomorrow.
Thank you Scott Halpern.
Now, if you STAY SILENT, you really won't have any OUT will you? NO ONE here on this thread believes you didn't see my posts.
So you won't be able to claim ignorance.
I've provided PLENTY of information to show that even YOUR two Nobel Prize winners can't refute this.
I bet you've never explained the BIGGEST reason physicians don't act ETHICALLY when the
"ethical dilemma" isn't even a DILEMMA. It's so OBVIOUSLY straightforward that the ONLY ethical thing to do is to have ANYONE refute the String Mechanism or if they can't? STOP VACCINES.
So, Scott, if you can't take the ONLY ethical action after being given all this information?
At least it will be APPARENT to the WORLD's scientists at some later time, that the MOST COMMON REASON physicians can't take the only ETHICAL ACTION is often because of what?
Because LOYALTY to your DEM group is so strong you can't be LOYAL to the HUMAN GROUP?
You would RATHER stay SILENT and protect KAMALA, a MASS KILLER of Americans with her vaccine mandate, than to help PROTECT children all over the world?
This is why the Democrat party is over.
An MD/PhD Bioethicist at the TOP OF HIS GAME, because he's a DEMOCRAT and supports KAMALA, can't behave ETHICALLY after receiving this NIGHTMARISH DISCOVERY that shows the FATAL FLAW with the COVID vaccine.
THIS is why the DEMOCRAT PARTY is FINISHED.
To be fair, I'll send you the SAME threads that the TWO NOBEL WINNERS got and who realized that they had made HUGE MISTAKES.
Thread 1. Weissman labs. @KKariko thought blocking me was a smart move? It ends her career.
x.com/lasikeyecenter…
Thread 2. Dr. Drew Weissman. The ONLY option for you? Call a press conference and request the immediate HALT of the COVID mRNA vaccine worldwide.
Unroll available on Thread Reader
Thread 3. Dr. Weissman, blood lung barrier.
Unroll available on Thread Reader
Thread 4. Dr. Drew Weissman. The Middle Man Mechanism. You have no chance. Call a PRESS CONFERENCE TOMORROW.
Unroll available on Thread Reader
Thread 5. Dr. Drew Weissman. You wake up and read all four threads. then block me?
The more educated a person is? The more that person should REALIZE that he or she is part of the HUMAN group and not just a member of some local club.
YOU are INCAPABLE of behaving ETHICALLY because YOUR loyalty to the DEMOCRAT GROUP is through the roof and making you UNETHICAL Prove me wrong. Take the ONLY ethical action left to you.
Or make it into the TEXTBOOKS as an example of how BIO-ETHICISTS are pretty USELESS unless you've got a HYPOTHETICAL scenario that they EXCEL at but can't get right in REAL LIFE.