To the FDA, Dr. Sara Brenner and Marty Makary & Novavax the irrefutable mechanism connecting most vaccines to AUTISM
DATE: April 28, 2025
RE: Breaking discovery showing an irrefutable mechanism between the COVID VACCINE (including many other childhood vaccines, including the DTaP vaccine discussed at length here) and AUTISM.
TO: Dr. Sara Brenner, FDA’s Principal Deputy Commissioner, Dr. Marty Makary, FDA Commissioner, Novavax, Inc., and all prior recipients of this email thread.
Dear Dr. Sara Brenner, Dr. Marty Makary and Novavax Executive leaders and Board of Directors,
Your COVID vaccine is irrefutably flawed. I presented much of this information to Dr. Anthony Fauci, back in SEP 2020 and again in FEB 2021, in a 73 page document that shows the COVID IgG antibody has NO VIABLE PATH through the blood-lung-barrier, which it must traverse in order to reach the lung alveolar epithelial cells, the principal cell target in the lung by COVID.
It is a ridiculously open and shut issue. These are irrefutable facts.
The lung air space contains the lung cells infected by COVID.
The lung air space is separated from the blood and body by the blood-lung-barrier.
This blood-lung-barrier, aka the air-gas barrier, can prevent tiny water molecules of 18 Daltons from filling our lung air space with fluid.
The COVID vaccine induces production of COVID IgG antibodies on the OUTSIDE of this blood-lung-barrier.
In order for the COVID IgG antibody to bind a COVID virus in the lung air space, it MUST traverse the blood-lung barrier.
The COVID IgG antibody molecule is a gargantuan 145,000 Dalton molecule.
The conclusion is simple. If the lung barrier can even stop the flow of tiny water molecules, to imagine that the COVID IgG antibody molecule, weighing 8000 times MORE than a water molecule, can traverse this blood-lung barrier is ridiculous and there is NO ARTICLE on earth that shows an active transport mechanism to effect this movement and this COVID IgG antibody would have to pass through via SIMPLE DIFFUSION and molecules this large would have an extremely low diffusion rate, much less than 1%.
Here is the 73 page document (summary sent to Dr. Anthony Fauci, with replies from his team back in SEP 2020) sent on FEB 2021, including a US Copyright and this document was sent to hundreds of directors at the NIH, CDC and FDA, with many providing me an email reply acknowledgement that they had received the document.
February 3, 2021. Potential Fatal Flaw
That essentially destroys any possible idea that any COVID vaccine can be efficacious via a neutralizing antibody in the lung air space. I DO provide a VERY VIABLE alternate hypothesis to show exactly how the COVID vaccine COULD have provided such good clinical research data numbers. That alternate hypothesis is extremely simple and impossible to rule out without extensive additional research. The hypothesis basically states that any foreign material injected into the body will often cause the body to produce interferons. IFN IS anti-viral in tens of thousands of papers. If indeed this hypothesis IS correct, then the vaccine is MERELY acting as a pro-drug since it induces the body to produce interferon which IS antiviral. But then, in medicine? It is UNETHICAL to treat a patient who does NOT have the illness with a medicine.
If I have DESTROYED their HYPOTHESIS of a neutralizing antibody in the lung air space which neutralizes a COVID virus SIMPLY by pointing out that the COVID antibody will NOT diffuse into the target tissue, this is such a MASSIVE OVERSIGHT on their part that they should be required to RE-SUBMIT the COMPLETE FDA Clinical Trial application, with a NEW CLINICAL TRIAL.
But, there is infinitely more here. I am CERTAIN that I pretty much destroyed any possible EFFICACY of the COVID vaccine via a neutralizing antibody in the lung. Now, here is the breaking discovery that shows the SAFETY of the COVID VACCINE is EXTREMELY POOR.
The issue is incredibly straightforward. The polyclonal COVID IgG antibodies in a child's blood is present as a direct result of the COVID vaccine. The spike antigen in this same child's blood is also present as a direct result of the COVID vaccine. You have both the polyclonal antibody and its foreign antigen in the blood of the child. Do your scientists NOT believe that the COVID antibody will bind the spike antigen?
In any general immunology textbook, if you look up "PRECIPITINS," you will discover that this is NOT new science. If you pour polyclonal antibodies into a beaker of saline and then ADD its antigen, there will be precipitation, which immunologists long ago have named, PRECIPITINS. Precipitins are VISIBLE to the naked eye. Capillaries are NOT. These PRECIPITINS can block blood vessels many times the size of capillaries and will cause ischemic damage. The COVID vaccine and booster had the MAIN EFFECT of causing ischemic damage via this mechanism. Not ONE of your physicians did the right thing, which is to call for a press conference and alert the world to this nightmare issue.
This same issue? Happens to affect HALF THE CHILDHOOD VACCINES and almost every imaginable future mRNA vaccine that uses a foreign antigen molecule to induce a polyclonal antibody response.
That is why this email thread is so long. Not ONE recipient of this email thread has been able to refute this BREAKING DISCOVERY that is probably the beginning of the end for all childhood vaccines.
The smoking gun connecting many childhood vaccines to autism HAS been found. I found the actual MECHANISM that NO vaccine scientist or pediatrician has been able to refute in over a year, not for lack of trying on my part.
A pediatrician gives a precious toddler the DTaP vaccine. It is irrefutable that the child develops DTaP antibodies which peak at around 2 to 3 months from the vaccine. Just when the DTaP antibodies peak in the boy's blood, the pediatrician injects the child with a booster DTaP vaccine, which IS the DTaP antigen. Now, you have this incredibly ridiculous situation where the child has polyclonal DTaP antibodies and the DTaP antigen in his blood. What do YOU ALL think will happen next?
In almost every general immunology textbook, even as far back as 30 years ago, when you put polyclonal antibodies into a beaker of saline and you ADD its antigen, there is VISIBLE CLUMPING of the antibody with its antigen. They even NAMED these visible clumps of antigen/antibody complexes, PRECIPITINS and describe these PRECIPITINS as being VISIBLE to the naked eye. The limit for the naked eye is typically about 0.1 mm or a100 micrometers. Red blood cells (diameter of 7 micrometers) course through capillaries of around 10 micrometers.
So, these clumps of DTaP antibodies/antigen can BLOCK blood vessels many times the size of capillaries. If this blockage occurs in blood vessels supplying the limbic system (that controls memory, anger, emotional responses, etc.) of the developing child's brain? The child will have symptoms mirroring the symptoms of autism.
I have probably reached out to at least the top 100 pro vaccine scientists/physicians and no one even TRIES to refute this mechanism that PERFECTLY connects THEIR vaccines with childhood autism. I am a board certified surgeon, licensed to practice in California (having performed over 70,000 Lasik surgeries in the past 27 years) and I can PUBLICLY call the American Academy of Pediatrics BABY KILLERS on X, with a THOROUGH THREAD (also published on my Substack) for their use of the HEP B vaccine on newborns and they are SILENT?
HOW would they ever refute this mechanism? I ONLY start with THEIR foreign antigen that is the BASIS of their vaccine and they can NEVER refute that, correct? Then, I ONLY use their STRONGEST science, that the antibody DOES bind the foreign antigen repeatedly (even if it is a foreign antigen from the vaccine). How would they EVER refute THAT, PRECIPITINS have been descrobed in THEIR immunology textbooks and described VERY THOROUGHLY for over 30 years.
This will be the BIGGEST paradigm shift in the history of all medicine and with an OVERSIGHT that is THIS STUPID? Not ONE pediatrician (67,000 members for the AAPeds) can simply EXPLAIN why they are giving this DTaP vaccine booster to MILLIONS of children every month?
Isn't it the most amazingly simple issue? I just DESTROYED any possible EFFICACY of your COVID vaccine via a neutralizing antibody in the lung, provided a PERFECT alternate hypothesis to explain why you DID achieve somewhat short term good results, and also DESTROYED anyone's ability to state that this COVID vaccine is SAFE.
You all have your work cut out for you.
And Dr. Marty Makary, if you want to learn MORE about my scientific integrity in describing all this, please contact Dr. Peter McDonnell, the Director of Ophthalmology at Johns Hopkins who trained me in refractive surgery back in 1998 and who I kept in touch with during these past five years. He was a witness to many of the early emails regarding those 73 pages to Fauci and company.
Regards,
/joseph y lee/
Electronic Signature
Joseph Y. Lee, MD
Emailed to the following.
care@kindercare.com
championshelp@kc-education.com
media@kindercare.com
chair@sec.gov
commissionerpeirce@sec.gov
commissionercrenshaw@sec.gov
commissioneruyeda@sec.gov
piar@dss.ca.gov
Alison.m.hunt@gsk.com
US.CPA@gsk.com
us.naps@gsk.com
andrei@zmescience.com
aallen@kff.org
WeCare@modernatx.com
emily.erbelding@nih.gov
Theodore.Pierson@nih.hhs.gov
Richard.Koup@nih.hhs.gov
Robert.Seder@nih.hhs.gov
eic@aai.org
abhinav.x.zullurwar@gsk.com
Michael.Krivich@ahss.org
Michael.Krivich@ahss.org<michael.krivich@ahss.org>
CVelasc@lasd.org
officeofthepresident@columbia.edu
columbianews@columbia.edu
jso2121@columbia.edu
ddm11@cumc.columbia.edu
gh2115@cumc.columbia.edu
la2423@cumc.columbia.edu
hc451@cumc.columbia.edu
pmw2137@cumc.columbia.edu
ml977@columbia.edu
pressoffice@donaldtrump.com
press@trumporg.com
jbrown@acenet.edu
mswarna@acenet.edu
laith.al-shawaf@uccs.edu
psych@uwaterloo.ca
shariff@psych.ubc.ca
j.a.c.everett@kent.ac.uk
mellers@sas.upenn.edu
adcollabproject@sas.upenn.edu
director@cdc.gov
jbc7@cdc.gov
klj4@cdc.gov
yyy8@cdc.gov
cworsham@mgh.harvard.edu
tetlock@wharton.upenn.edu
paulrobertconnor@gmail.com
dylan.matthews@vox.com
Alexandra.Saint@fda.hhs.gov
vantongeren@hope.edu
communications@templeton.org
Sumathi.Reddy@wsj.com
peter.loftus@wsj.com
joshua.levy@ropesgray.com
mark.barnes@ropesgray.com
john.bueker@ropesgray.com
elena.davis@ropesgray.com
douglas.hallward-driemeier@ropesgray.com
stephen.sencer@ropesgray.com
steve@lkcfirm.com
scott@lkcfirm.com
jon@lkcfirm.com
mary@lkcfirm.com
shannon@lkcfirm.com
jacob@lkcfirm.com
katie@lkcfirm.com
josh@lkcfirm.com
danielle@lkcfirm.com
alan_garber@harvard.edu
meredith_weenick@harvard.edu
manuel_cuevas-trisan@harvard.edu
Sara.Brenner@fda.hhs.gov
kalves@Novavax.com
jplested@Novavax.com
ir@novavax.com
media@novavax.com
nnaser@novavax.com
jjacobs@novavax.com
mmcglynn@novavax.com
galton@novavax.com
rdouglas@novavax.com
rking@novavax.com
dmott@novavax.com
rrodgers@novavax.com
jshiver@novavax.com
jtrizzino@novavax.com
mcasey@novavax.com
rcrowley@novavax.com
rDraghia-Akli@novavax.com
jkelley@novavax.com
eo'hara@novavax.com
hukwu@novavax.com
tmorgan@novavax.com
rwalker@novavax.com
CC
commissionerpeirce@sec.gov
carolyn.johnson@washpost.com
gmunick@acenet.edu
rhur@kslaw.com
president@harvard.edu
https://drgator.substack.com/p/a-pediatrician-takes-on-the-cdc?publication_id=531463&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=18h3vn&utm_medium=email
I guess this MD may need informational support. Just saying…☺️