@sergeimirkat I think I'm the world's foremost expert on PRECIPITINS and the STRING mechanism of action.
But, I also have a better understanding of waves than any physicist I've ever met.
@sergeimirkat Here are the mechanics of waves.
When they performed the double slit experiment?
And they concluded that the photon had a "dual nature?"
Because they couldn't explain the "wave-like" pattern created by the double slit?
@sergeimirkat the dumb physicists CONCLUDED that the photon MUST have a "dual nature" BECAUSE of the wave-like properties the photon manifested in the double slit experiment.
well, what is the most classic wave? water waves. Does the water molecule also possess a "dual nature?"
@sergeimirkat clearly, and indisputably, JUST because wave-like properties manifest does NOT mean that you can assume MAGIC (assuming a dual nature for the photon IS invoking MAGIC).
And the HUGE inconsistency was in their very EXPLANATION of why they were invoking MAGIC.
@sergeimirkat when I was fighting this vaccine with the lung barrier issue, I met so many dumb physicians.
It struck me. Dummies can't ONLY be in medicine.
And I was depressed when RFKjr's group decided to NOT use my info after much debate.
So, I took a month off and asked myself.
@sergeimirkat Of all the science I've learned in my life, what did I DISLIKE the most?
The double slit experiment and their interpretation, which led to quantum physics.
So, I sat and did physics experiments for a month. within a week, I had the experiment to disprove their interpretation.
@sergeimirkat Just because a particle manifests wave-like properties does NOT mean that that particle has a dual nature.
Water molecules display wave-like properties. it is clear that water molecules are ONLY particles and have no DUAL NATURE.
@sergeimirkat Just because a photon manifests wave-like properties does NOT mean that that photon has a dual nature.
NOTHING else we have EVER studied has a "dual nature."
Why is THIS the reasoning to assume that the photon has a "dual nature?" It's sheer stupidity.
@sergeimirkat don't hope for quantum computing anytime soon.
it's all based on a complete misunderstanding of the double slit experiment.
the photon is a particle. many particles can display wave-like properties. nothing more. you don't have to invoke magic to explain wave-like properties
@sergeimirkat stupidity is everywhere people. especially among the left leaning dems.
stupidity is often covered up by scientists who pretend to excel at math. that's often the first clue. quantum physics is classic for that kind of hoodwinking.
@sergeimirkat in science? a FALSE CAUSE is the most HUMILIATING situation. why? Because typically, there IS a good result.
Like rain dancing as the false cause for RAIN. when it does rain? It's a GOOD RESULT.
When children heal from measles? it's a GOOD RESULT.
@sergeimirkat and so "false causes" are HUMILIATING because they tend to KEEP GOING for a LONG TIME, like the rain dancers.
Like the vaccinologists.
and WHEN the "false cause" is exposed? it's been a LONG WHILE and VERY EMBARRASSING to those high priests of human child sacrifice.
@sergeimirkat the quantum physicists and vaccinologists both had horrible scientific reasoning for their conclusions.
both evolved complex language to prevent the lay person from understanding what the hell they were doing and saying.
both had positive results, not from their doing
@sergeimirkat the HUGE mistake that quantum physicists made when they interpreted the double slit experiment?
they didn't exhaust every possible boring, mundane explanation. they just immediately jumped to invoking magic.
@sergeimirkat for a photon to have a "dual nature" and manifest its wave-like nature ONLY when there is a double slit?
as retarded as the vaccinologists to assume that the COVID antibody saved us when it wasn't even present in 2020.
@sergeimirkat i explain the double slit with the simplest and most mundane explanation.
yes, it's irrefutable and it will have a huge impact on physics.
theory of relativity is a joke too. seriously.
@sergeimirkat a clue. photons are visible why? because they interacted with something else.
there is no other way to determine whether a photon is present or not.
we see "light" because the photon did interact with our photoreceptors.
@sergeimirkat if photons can interact with our photoreceptors, then why would a photon NOT be able to interact with OTHER PHOTONS?
Of course they can.
Then if photons hit the sides of the double slits, won't those photons interact with the photons still coming out of the laser? yes.
@sergeimirkat the idiot physicists never even considered the HUGE possibility that photons bouncing off the edges of the double slit could interact with photons that didn't hit the edges.
such a simple, mundane explanation that they didn't consider? retarded? I think so.
@sergeimirkat vaccinologists and pediatricians aren't the only groups of people who will hate me.
quantum physicists will be very angry with me for destroying their stupid field.
@sergeimirkat oh, that wasn't just a clue. that was the answer.
but, the experiment to show that? quite the experiment. impossible to refute.
I couldn't believe it myself. repeated it thousands of times. the end of quantum physics. why not let it happen at the same time vaccines end
@sergeimirkat I'll make a youtube video of my experiment and put it up in a couple of weeks.
might as well take down both quantum and vaccines at the same time.
@sergeimirkat no one wondered why quantum computers never worked? because the whole field is based on a bunch of nothing. the photon is just a particle. it doesn't have a dual nature.
they extrapolated from their stupid math. higher math? stupidest thing on earth.
I really want to see the photon thing.....not smart enough to understand quantum physics....but I could never understand a particle with two properties?