I think currently you have two states of mind ongoing.
The first is anger. Outrage at what they did to you. Demands justice, SCREAMS it. Name-calling them, it says, is fair and just, because they wronged you, you get to wrong them back.
The second is logic. It says the evidence proves that you're right, that the position is unassailable, therefore you don't need to justify your approaches because they work. Could they work better? Perhaps, but 'they work', so no need to change.
I'm going to share something with you Lee, as a seasoned debater for nearly a decade and a half. I've dealt with, refuted, people of all sorts of different capacities and walks of life; University accredited lawyers, researchers, doctors, consultants, government talking heads; I've been banned, blocked, muted, censored by more than quite a few, and influenced others.
I have a saying, and it still holds true to this day: half of an argument is PR.
Imagine if you will, two men.
One is dressed as a hobo, he screams and shouts his theories and ideas at people as they pass by on the street.
The other is a finely dressed, well kempt man, he speaks politely, acts warmly to people, and points to evidence and reason to make his case.
Both of these men can advocate the exact same theories and ideas. Both could be entirely, 100% correct.
The public, however, will *always* resonate with the finely dressed, well kempt man, because to them, his appearance is pleasing. The man who shouts at them scares and worries them.
I received so much abuse, because giving a clean PR appearance offers no vector for an attack, so the opponent can *only* engage with the evidence presented, or otherwise they simply invent slanderous lies out of desperate, discrediting themselves in the process.
Your goal, is to out-PR the enemy.
You can choose whatever form of PR you wish to use, but remember, 50% of the argument's success relies on the PR. The appearance. I bet when you convince folks in person, you're professionally dressed, and keep your fine appearance of credentials about you.
There's more to the Milgram experiment than meets the eye. The door swings both ways.
I'm pretty sure that this is the tip of a huge iceberg. My kids hate it when I mention "paradigm shift" becuz I've said it too many times. but how many times has anyone seen one this large in medicine? never. it's almost as if there are no rules in this "twilight zone" like Torma says. it's not like we have "data" to show this or that approach is more effective. i've thought about it plenty.
While I would normally agree with your PR strategies, which by all metrics in the PR field are very sound, we entered a twilight zone of sorts in late 2019, because effectively that was the beginning of the fear porn. That changed everything! To get through the digital lobotomy Joseph may actually have the best approach. It’s tough to break through the zombie nation.
and i appreciate those words. I also know that I've always detested the superficial. I've always been crappy at PR. I have always felt the fundamental should so outweigh the superficial that putting effort into the superficial seems fake to me. that's never what I was good at. and the part of me that challenges the existing thought, rules, the part that let me actually FIND the rationale that shows why the paradigm shift will inevitably eventually occur? that part of me balks at focusing on the superficial.
We all use different approaches, and if it works, it works. I'm just explaining why some people 'take offense'. Frankly, I'm more offended they're not outraged at the mass murder of children.
Just remember Lee, you won't be able to please all of the people all of the time. There will always be critics.
The fear porn route works on people who are compelled by emotions, and involves 'thresholding' (or 'critical mass') psychology. You can't use those tactics as an individual as it requires the creation of a minimum threshold consensus (read: there needs to be enough people screaming out in fear for the rest to start panicking).
You can try to use scaremongering tactics, however it means you'll be in a fight with the propaganda media arm fear porn generation system and against such resources you're guaranteed to lose. Instead, if you give people evidence, what happens is they start to become more resistant to the fear porn (the evidence gives them confidence to resist).
But for them to accept the evidence, it has to be wrapped in a proverbial lab coat (per Milgram experiment). Yeah, humans are illogical and contradictory, but I didn't build the game board, I'm just merely a player upon the stage.
One day we walked by each other smiled and said hello or we may have said fuck off and the next day we were masked up and socially distanced. That was the moment the world was in panic. That was the moment that millions revolted against the tyranny. That was the moment that many underwent self lobotomies as there was never a shred of fact to support masking or distancing. That was the moment that set the threshold where the zombified required the shock out of stupor which required savage dialogue. PR experience was and is totally useless in a military psyop. As an example, in Canada the military openly admitted to psyoping the Canadian public and the surveillance of 33million cell phones. There is a different operation under foot and PR experience is useless.
Dr. Lee I like your style. Like you I want to see the vaccines brought to a halt.
To destroy the vaccine requires a groundswell that will make the courts afraid not to hear vaccine damage cases. The 70 Universities who still have their vaccine mandates in place have given us an opportunity to send a massive shock through the system and in one fell swoop destroy the legitimacy of the authoritarians who are waiting for a second opportunity to force their will on us.
I have the outlines of a plan, the spark of which came from my sparring with vaccine lovers that at their next booster they should personally do the Active Monitoring that the FDA waived for Pharma at the beginning of the mass rollout campaign where I encourage them to do a series of blood draws once a week for 60 days looking for troponin and d-dimer, and then I explain that a spike in either enzyme is clinical PROOF that the vaccine had an "off target" effect and did at least subclinical damage to their heart and microvasculature. Then I finish them off by saying clinical tests are just science. Are you brave enough to do the science? You believe in science right?
So, the plan:
Why can't we organize a blitz campaign of informed consent on these campuses laying out the known mechanisms of damage of the mRNA platform in a well illustrated trifold pamphlet or short booklet that will also tell them where to go and how to test for damage to themselves?
In addition to the blood tests, I have been telling men that a quick and dirty way to see if Fauci and Bourla have damaged them is by getting their swimmers checked out in a fertility test. The thought of damaged gonads gets the guys to pay more attention it seems than alerting them to possible heart damage. If Fauci and Bourla fried my 'boys' I would be one pissed mfer!
Passing on information is step one. In an ideal scenario we would have the Pillow Guy or some other daddy warbucks who would offer to cover the costs of the clinical testing for these students.
Once you have large groups of students with clinical results in hand who have parents angry as hell, then the possibility of class action law suits with a groundswell of public support become possible. I would Love to see Harvard have to shell out a couple of Billion in damages, and it would not cause me to shed a tear if a couple of Universities were sued into the dust to serve as a cautionary tale to future wannabe authoritarians to check their egos at the door.
I have suggested this plan to Naomi Wolf - no response; to Steve Kirsch - "the courts will never let us try the case"; and dozens of others. Everybody is TOO BUSY to actually step up and help the kids fight off this destruction of their future.... even though THEY ARE THE FUTURE!
I have reached out to TPUSA to plant a bug in their ear about organizing the campaign... haven't heard back yet.
Wish I could read this stuff but it’s so vitriolic at a time when we need level discussion and calm; and it’s so illiterately thrown together (I hesitate to say “composed”) that I can’t find the mental space for it. A shame because any worthwhile points made will be lost to me.
yes, and that's how you were built. you were never built for war. you would have been the soul who just couldn't pull the trigger at the enemy villagers. I get it. but, you haven't walked in my shoes for 4 years. and this is vitriolic? to me, this was holding back as hard as I could. and ultimately, for me, polite words? at a time when it's so clear to me that they are injecting clot forming vaccines into children all dressed up in their nice suits, very well kept, well groomed, nice white coat. to me, to be POLITE and respectful to those people? is being RUDE to the children who they're doing this to. the "other" side never even discussed with me when I was "professional." they just dismissed me and calmly hung up on me. for four years. and your mind will never approve of this level of "vitriol" with words but there is infinitely worse vitriol with actions currently occurring; your mind accepts THAT. not my mind. because I compare the rude words and the evil actions and the rude language isn't rude. it's polite given how horrible and evil their actions are.
Exactly. We're at war. An asymmetric, inverse reality war. You can't go into it with a polite stance. Fighting mad, because you're at war and can't fully understand the asymmetric lethal attacks all done within and from the institutions.
when people get upset with me for my language? I think they're just trying to be SUPER loyal to the DUMB dem leadership or have NO idea how RUDE it is to inject poison into people and MANDATE the stupidity.
If they had the EXACT info to STOP the vaccine but they refused to use the BEST science, then aren't they baby killers? You're protecting your heroes. but they suck.
and they did NOT save thousands of lives. they literally didn't even have a CLUE to what the human body actually DID to fight off the virus.
They actually KILLED people because they didn't put FASTING at the TOP of their protocols because fasting is INFINITELY better than any of their protocols.
For them to believe they HELPED the human body, they had NO idea WHAT the human body DID DO to destroy the COVID viral mRNA inside our lung cells. They just did NOT get in the WAY of the human body healing itself. No, they want to take CREDIT for what the human body did. They don't even have a single HYPOTHESIS to explain what they think the body did. It's their EGO to think they HELPED.
and BECAUSE they realized the science I presented was SPOT ON, they REFUSED to share the science to keep THEIR social media power. That's DARK and EVIL.
I'm a surgeon. If I have a brand new assistant who does NOT know my surgeries and does NOT know my next moves, my goals, then the assistant is NOT very helpful and can NOT facilitate what I do. The ONLY way to HELP the human body? and to FACILITATE what the human body did so amazingly well? IS TO KNOW the exact MECHANISM the body used to DESTROY the COVID mRNA within our LUNG cells.
And they do NOT even have a HYPOTHESIS for what the human body did. I DO. The human body used RNase enzymes to DESTROY the viral mRNA inside our lung cells. And we can INCREASE active RNase enzymes by fasting which OXIDIZES the RNase inhibitor which comes OFF when oxidized.
So, if the human body was able to save 99% of people under 45 in the year 2020, with NO COVID antibodies, but activated RNase enzymes, then when FASTING you can HELP the human body and make it 99.99% very easily.
So, they didn't save THOUSANDS of lives. They had NO CLUE as to HOW the human body was FIGHTING the virus. They had NO CLUE as to HOW to FACILITATE the human body. They don't get ANY credit. Sorry, you have some FAKE heroes on your hands
Keep re- presenting your truths .
As I have just found you through Dr Alexander.
Yes it is a war and they play dirty it is also a spiritual war Dr Lee
Get your family together to pray as I will to keep you safe
The noose is getting tighter everyday on all these people
I have faith in your work
Remember God is in control and He is allowing this to happen as Society has given Him the flick
I think currently you have two states of mind ongoing.
The first is anger. Outrage at what they did to you. Demands justice, SCREAMS it. Name-calling them, it says, is fair and just, because they wronged you, you get to wrong them back.
The second is logic. It says the evidence proves that you're right, that the position is unassailable, therefore you don't need to justify your approaches because they work. Could they work better? Perhaps, but 'they work', so no need to change.
I'm going to share something with you Lee, as a seasoned debater for nearly a decade and a half. I've dealt with, refuted, people of all sorts of different capacities and walks of life; University accredited lawyers, researchers, doctors, consultants, government talking heads; I've been banned, blocked, muted, censored by more than quite a few, and influenced others.
I have a saying, and it still holds true to this day: half of an argument is PR.
Imagine if you will, two men.
One is dressed as a hobo, he screams and shouts his theories and ideas at people as they pass by on the street.
The other is a finely dressed, well kempt man, he speaks politely, acts warmly to people, and points to evidence and reason to make his case.
Both of these men can advocate the exact same theories and ideas. Both could be entirely, 100% correct.
The public, however, will *always* resonate with the finely dressed, well kempt man, because to them, his appearance is pleasing. The man who shouts at them scares and worries them.
I received so much abuse, because giving a clean PR appearance offers no vector for an attack, so the opponent can *only* engage with the evidence presented, or otherwise they simply invent slanderous lies out of desperate, discrediting themselves in the process.
Your goal, is to out-PR the enemy.
You can choose whatever form of PR you wish to use, but remember, 50% of the argument's success relies on the PR. The appearance. I bet when you convince folks in person, you're professionally dressed, and keep your fine appearance of credentials about you.
There's more to the Milgram experiment than meets the eye. The door swings both ways.
I'm pretty sure that this is the tip of a huge iceberg. My kids hate it when I mention "paradigm shift" becuz I've said it too many times. but how many times has anyone seen one this large in medicine? never. it's almost as if there are no rules in this "twilight zone" like Torma says. it's not like we have "data" to show this or that approach is more effective. i've thought about it plenty.
While I would normally agree with your PR strategies, which by all metrics in the PR field are very sound, we entered a twilight zone of sorts in late 2019, because effectively that was the beginning of the fear porn. That changed everything! To get through the digital lobotomy Joseph may actually have the best approach. It’s tough to break through the zombie nation.
and i appreciate those words. I also know that I've always detested the superficial. I've always been crappy at PR. I have always felt the fundamental should so outweigh the superficial that putting effort into the superficial seems fake to me. that's never what I was good at. and the part of me that challenges the existing thought, rules, the part that let me actually FIND the rationale that shows why the paradigm shift will inevitably eventually occur? that part of me balks at focusing on the superficial.
We all use different approaches, and if it works, it works. I'm just explaining why some people 'take offense'. Frankly, I'm more offended they're not outraged at the mass murder of children.
Just remember Lee, you won't be able to please all of the people all of the time. There will always be critics.
The fear porn route works on people who are compelled by emotions, and involves 'thresholding' (or 'critical mass') psychology. You can't use those tactics as an individual as it requires the creation of a minimum threshold consensus (read: there needs to be enough people screaming out in fear for the rest to start panicking).
You can try to use scaremongering tactics, however it means you'll be in a fight with the propaganda media arm fear porn generation system and against such resources you're guaranteed to lose. Instead, if you give people evidence, what happens is they start to become more resistant to the fear porn (the evidence gives them confidence to resist).
But for them to accept the evidence, it has to be wrapped in a proverbial lab coat (per Milgram experiment). Yeah, humans are illogical and contradictory, but I didn't build the game board, I'm just merely a player upon the stage.
One day we walked by each other smiled and said hello or we may have said fuck off and the next day we were masked up and socially distanced. That was the moment the world was in panic. That was the moment that millions revolted against the tyranny. That was the moment that many underwent self lobotomies as there was never a shred of fact to support masking or distancing. That was the moment that set the threshold where the zombified required the shock out of stupor which required savage dialogue. PR experience was and is totally useless in a military psyop. As an example, in Canada the military openly admitted to psyoping the Canadian public and the surveillance of 33million cell phones. There is a different operation under foot and PR experience is useless.
Dr. Lee I like your style. Like you I want to see the vaccines brought to a halt.
To destroy the vaccine requires a groundswell that will make the courts afraid not to hear vaccine damage cases. The 70 Universities who still have their vaccine mandates in place have given us an opportunity to send a massive shock through the system and in one fell swoop destroy the legitimacy of the authoritarians who are waiting for a second opportunity to force their will on us.
I have the outlines of a plan, the spark of which came from my sparring with vaccine lovers that at their next booster they should personally do the Active Monitoring that the FDA waived for Pharma at the beginning of the mass rollout campaign where I encourage them to do a series of blood draws once a week for 60 days looking for troponin and d-dimer, and then I explain that a spike in either enzyme is clinical PROOF that the vaccine had an "off target" effect and did at least subclinical damage to their heart and microvasculature. Then I finish them off by saying clinical tests are just science. Are you brave enough to do the science? You believe in science right?
So, the plan:
Why can't we organize a blitz campaign of informed consent on these campuses laying out the known mechanisms of damage of the mRNA platform in a well illustrated trifold pamphlet or short booklet that will also tell them where to go and how to test for damage to themselves?
In addition to the blood tests, I have been telling men that a quick and dirty way to see if Fauci and Bourla have damaged them is by getting their swimmers checked out in a fertility test. The thought of damaged gonads gets the guys to pay more attention it seems than alerting them to possible heart damage. If Fauci and Bourla fried my 'boys' I would be one pissed mfer!
Passing on information is step one. In an ideal scenario we would have the Pillow Guy or some other daddy warbucks who would offer to cover the costs of the clinical testing for these students.
Once you have large groups of students with clinical results in hand who have parents angry as hell, then the possibility of class action law suits with a groundswell of public support become possible. I would Love to see Harvard have to shell out a couple of Billion in damages, and it would not cause me to shed a tear if a couple of Universities were sued into the dust to serve as a cautionary tale to future wannabe authoritarians to check their egos at the door.
I have suggested this plan to Naomi Wolf - no response; to Steve Kirsch - "the courts will never let us try the case"; and dozens of others. Everybody is TOO BUSY to actually step up and help the kids fight off this destruction of their future.... even though THEY ARE THE FUTURE!
I have reached out to TPUSA to plant a bug in their ear about organizing the campaign... haven't heard back yet.
Comments? Criticisms? I welcome them.
Wish I could read this stuff but it’s so vitriolic at a time when we need level discussion and calm; and it’s so illiterately thrown together (I hesitate to say “composed”) that I can’t find the mental space for it. A shame because any worthwhile points made will be lost to me.
yes, and that's how you were built. you were never built for war. you would have been the soul who just couldn't pull the trigger at the enemy villagers. I get it. but, you haven't walked in my shoes for 4 years. and this is vitriolic? to me, this was holding back as hard as I could. and ultimately, for me, polite words? at a time when it's so clear to me that they are injecting clot forming vaccines into children all dressed up in their nice suits, very well kept, well groomed, nice white coat. to me, to be POLITE and respectful to those people? is being RUDE to the children who they're doing this to. the "other" side never even discussed with me when I was "professional." they just dismissed me and calmly hung up on me. for four years. and your mind will never approve of this level of "vitriol" with words but there is infinitely worse vitriol with actions currently occurring; your mind accepts THAT. not my mind. because I compare the rude words and the evil actions and the rude language isn't rude. it's polite given how horrible and evil their actions are.
Exactly. We're at war. An asymmetric, inverse reality war. You can't go into it with a polite stance. Fighting mad, because you're at war and can't fully understand the asymmetric lethal attacks all done within and from the institutions.
when people get upset with me for my language? I think they're just trying to be SUPER loyal to the DUMB dem leadership or have NO idea how RUDE it is to inject poison into people and MANDATE the stupidity.
what, out them when all is said and done?
If they had the EXACT info to STOP the vaccine but they refused to use the BEST science, then aren't they baby killers? You're protecting your heroes. but they suck.
and they did NOT save thousands of lives. they literally didn't even have a CLUE to what the human body actually DID to fight off the virus.
They actually KILLED people because they didn't put FASTING at the TOP of their protocols because fasting is INFINITELY better than any of their protocols.
For them to believe they HELPED the human body, they had NO idea WHAT the human body DID DO to destroy the COVID viral mRNA inside our lung cells. They just did NOT get in the WAY of the human body healing itself. No, they want to take CREDIT for what the human body did. They don't even have a single HYPOTHESIS to explain what they think the body did. It's their EGO to think they HELPED.
and BECAUSE they realized the science I presented was SPOT ON, they REFUSED to share the science to keep THEIR social media power. That's DARK and EVIL.
I'm a surgeon. If I have a brand new assistant who does NOT know my surgeries and does NOT know my next moves, my goals, then the assistant is NOT very helpful and can NOT facilitate what I do. The ONLY way to HELP the human body? and to FACILITATE what the human body did so amazingly well? IS TO KNOW the exact MECHANISM the body used to DESTROY the COVID mRNA within our LUNG cells.
And they do NOT even have a HYPOTHESIS for what the human body did. I DO. The human body used RNase enzymes to DESTROY the viral mRNA inside our lung cells. And we can INCREASE active RNase enzymes by fasting which OXIDIZES the RNase inhibitor which comes OFF when oxidized.
So, if the human body was able to save 99% of people under 45 in the year 2020, with NO COVID antibodies, but activated RNase enzymes, then when FASTING you can HELP the human body and make it 99.99% very easily.
So, they didn't save THOUSANDS of lives. They had NO CLUE as to HOW the human body was FIGHTING the virus. They had NO CLUE as to HOW to FACILITATE the human body. They don't get ANY credit. Sorry, you have some FAKE heroes on your hands
YES. If they had MADE FUN of Fauci because the antibody can't enter the lung air space becuz the BLOOD LUNG BARRIER is in the WAY.